NT Scholar: ‘Jesus’ Wife’ Fragment Not Worth the Papyrus It’s Written On

Authentic photo of Jesus and his wife, verified by a scholar at a reputable university.

Ya think?

A New Testament scholar claims to have found evidence suggesting that the Gospel of Jesus’s Wife is a modern forgery.

Professor Francis Watson, of Durham University, says the papyrus fragment, which caused a worldwide sensation when it appeared earlier this week because it appeared to refer to Jesus’s wife, is a patchwork of texts from the genuine Coptic-language Gospel of Thomas, which have been copied and reassembled out of order to make a suggestive new whole.

In a paper published online, Watson argues that all of the sentence fragments found on the papyrus fragment have been copied, sometimes with small alterations, from printed editions of the Gospel of Thomas.

The discovery has already sparked fierce debate among academics, but Watson believes his new research may prove conclusive.

“I think it is more or less indisputable that I have shown how the thing was composed,” he said. “I would be very surprised if it were not a modern forgery, although it is possible that it was composed in this way in the fourth century.”

His paper claims the work was assembled by someone who was not a native speaker of Coptic, which is a polite way of saying that it is modern. [emphasis emphasized by me]

Oh these kids today with their fake papyri and married messiahs. Get a haircut you hippie freaks! AND GET OFF MY LAWN!

[Watson] believes this is a forgery comparable with a papyrus fragment that caused a scandal in the 1970s by being presented as a variant of the Gospel According to Mark, in which Jesus spent the night with naked youths.

It’s like you just don’t know who to trust anymore.

Now I’m sure this comes as a stunning surprise to my readers, who were getting ready to hand in their offering envelopes and sign up for membership in their local chapter of American Atheists. Or The Episcopal Church. Whichever was closest.

In the immortal words of Ronald Reagan: Distrust, then gloat.


2 thoughts on “NT Scholar: ‘Jesus’ Wife’ Fragment Not Worth the Papyrus It’s Written On

  1. Reblogged this on God is speaking today and commented:
    Every few decades someone comes up with some “new” thing which turns out to be something not new, possibly false, and maybe even a carefully concocted fraud. A Biblical-Piltdown man so to speak. My guess is that people get horrible bored staring at fragments and their minds wander or go wild, or they think they can have 15 (or maybe 30) minutes of media fame. This too will pass away. To paraphrase Gamaliel, don’t fall for gimmicks – truth eventually will out.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s